1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

How can you really fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plant life, had set up a straightforward treatment. He gave journals tips for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, providing them with names and e-mail addresses. But these addresses were ones he created, therefore the requests to review went right to him or his co-workers. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 content articles in various journals published by Informa were retracted, and one editor resigned. An editor at among the journals published by Sage Publications became suspicious, sparking a thorough and lengthy investigation, in July 2014 which resulted in the retraction of 60 articles.In subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, regions of dense accumulation of MUC5B were observed in regions of microscopical honeycombing and involved patchy staining of the metaplastic epithelia lining the honeycomb cysts ; there was also staining of the mucous plugs within the cysts . No obvious variations in MUC5B staining features were observed in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who experienced the MUC5B promoter polymorphism. Dialogue We identified a common variant in the putative promoter of MUC5B that’s associated with the development of familial interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Linkage, good mapping, selective resequencing of MUC2 and MUC5AC, and a genetic evaluation of the gel-forming mucin region at the p-terminus of chromosome 11 resulted in the identification of a SNP in the putative MUC5B promoter that’s strongly associated with both MUC5B expression in the lung among unaffected topics and the advancement of familial interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.