The use of aspirin for the emergency treatment of heart attacks had shown previously.

Aspirin and clopidogrel are anti – platelet drugs through different mechanisms through different mechanisms. The use of aspirin for the emergency treatment of heart attacks had shown previously, the risk for death and repeat heart attacks by about one quarter. The aim of the COMMIT/CCS-2 was to see whether adding clopidogrel to aspirin might be even better than aspirin alone.

COMMIT/CCS-2 aimed to determine whether orally, by intravenous metoprolol during a heart attack could then reduce deaths and. Risk of repeat heart attacks and cardiac arrest.. The study also found that what the beta-blocker metoprolol as an emergency treatment for heart attack reduces the risk of recurrence of myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation[1]. Throws early use of beta – blocker treatment, the risk of cardiac shock in the period immediately after a heart attack, and early early benefits and hazards rather mutually exclusive.

Beta-blockers are proven effective long-term treatment in the years after a heart attack. But it is their value as emergency treatment and unsafe such use is limited, although current guidelines advise prompt administration contraindications contraindications.Job radical nephrectomy has the default surgical treatment patients with localized RCC, however partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic surgery viable alternatives attractive alternatives who are less invasive, but equally effective. However, many doctors non adopted these surgical techniques despite its advantages.

KREBS, Published online 10 March 2008 printed Issue Date: April 15.

The researchers studied using radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, and laparoscopic in such patients and determine Surgical and patient-based factors, which decision about the type from operating been used have helped. Total 611 patients partially nephrectomy and 4,872 underwent radically nephrectomies, five hundred fifteen been conducted of them laparoscopically. Carried out after consideration of factors such patient demographics, comorbidity, tumor size, and volume of the operations from each surgeons, were considerable differences between the surgeon into the type of surgery they led – a 18, Christopher S variance of partial nephrectomy and 37.4 percent of variance of laparoscopic.